Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

10 Must-Read Social Media & Leadership Stories From June 7-11

1. 5 helpful steps to re-energize your leadership.

2. Twitter is playing a hand in…South Korea’s election.

3. The 2010 World Cup is finally here. Leaders can learn a few things.

4. Lessons leaders can learn from the BP oil spill.

5. Stalin is making a comeback.

6. Is the price of college worth it? Great New Yorker article.

7. 5 no-nonsense suggestions for surviving corporate calamities.

8. Smartphones may not be as private as you think.

9. England and the thirteen colonies face-off again.

10. The (unofficial) history of the business card.

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

What Soccer Captains Can Teach Us About Leadership vs. Management

Albert Camus once said, “All I know most surely about morality and obligations, I owe to football.” (The Algerian-born writer was, of course, referring to what we call soccer) If 22 people running between two nets with a ball can speak to Camus on a broard philosophical level I think I can earnestly say without the fear of looking simple that soccer has taught me the basics of leadership.

Soccer captains, the individuals elected to wear the yellow arm band on a team, are primarily responsible for translating the vitriolic emotions of their colleagues to the referee. They are also charged with deciding what role each player will adopt in set plays, arranging off-the-cuff defensive patterns, and keeping everyone motivated.

A captain isn’t necessarily the best player on the team. Instead, captains are diligent, emotionally strong athletes that spark action and loathe laziness. They are hard working players with work-a-day skills who lead by example.

Captains are analogues to organizational mangers if we use the language of Warren Bennis. Bennis states, “The manager has his or her eye always on the bottom line; the leader’s eye is on the horizon.” Indeed, soccer captains energize specific games and circumstances. They leave long term strategies to club owners and coaches. Captains are the dyed-in-the-wool, in the moment, leaders. They are sources of calm and composure under duress.

Captains act as intermediaries between visionary coaches and team mates. They ask, in Bennis’ phraseology, how and when and let the club owners ask what and why.

That captains exist and can be instrumental to a team’s success should teach leaders a very important lesson: managers and the strategies they employ can motivate teams quickly and effectively

Bobby Moore (1941-1993) was the youngest captain of the English national team. He would eventually help his country win the World Cup in 1966. Famed English soccer writer Paul Gardner, writes, “No wonder they made him England’s captain at 22, everyone he played with had a story about his coolness.” Gardner wasn’t speaking about his popularity, but rather Moore’s ability to keep calm “under fire.”

Moore was able to be a source of calm for his team and it helped produce results. Moore wasn’t creating new visions or supplying his teammates with detailed plans. He was making what he loved to do look easy, stress-free, and, more importantly, fun.

Good leaders can be a source of forward looking visions, but they can also take a page from a captain’s or manager’s play book. They can work hard and set examples to follow, display calm, and provide reassurance.

Regardless of how or where you draw the distinction between leader and manager soccer captains prove that good leadership stems from hard work, getting dirty, and keeping collected under fire. You don’t just need a yellow arm band to manage.

Picture Credit: Flawka

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

Lessons Learned Through Verdi’s Stiffelio

Sometimes being innovative and being creative isn’t enough.  Sometimes you need persistence, luck, and fortitude—and more often than not, you just need to be in the right place at the right time. Just look at Verdi’s Stiffelio.

For the first time since its 1993 Metropolitan Opera debut, the Met presented Verdi’s seldom produced 1850 opera Stiffelio.  That it exists at all is something of a miracle, and that it turns out to be a terrific opera with a splendid if not absolutely top-tier Verdi score, is a delightful surprise.

Stiffelio did not begin life auspiciously.  Mid-19th century Catholic Italy was unprepared for a story (based on the play, Le Pasteur, ou L’évangile et le foyer) about a Protestant minister, Stiffelio, who divorces and then forgives his unfaithful wife.  The censors, despite Verdi’s will, insisted on changing Stiffelio into an orator and removing all biblical quotes and references–making the story dry and wringing the drama from the characters.

The premiere in Trieste was given a lukewarm reception, as were its subsequent performances, and Verdi asked that all copies of the score be destroyed.  A few years later, he reused much of the music in a new opera called Aroldo. While Aroldo was set in 13th century England and the title character was a crusader just returned from Palestine–it fared no better.

And that would have been the end of the story, had not bits and pieces of the score begun to surface in the 1960s, culminating in the discovery of an almost complete autograph of Stiffelio in 1992—upon which the Met production is based.

The Saturday matinee I attended was sold out and the cheers from the packed house would have probably continued until the evening performance—had the houselights not come up.  Tenor José Cura as the deeply conflicted title character, soprano Julianna Di Giacomo, his wife Lina, and baritone Andrzej Dobber, her father Stankar, headed a first-rate cast—all of whom sounded glorious and all of whom acted persuasively.  The great Met orchestra was ably led by the beloved tenor Plácido Domingo, who sang the role of Stiffelio when this production debuted 17 years ago.

That this opera is with us today proves that being proactive may entail putting something on the shelf for a while until it is rediscovered.