Categories
BLG Leadership Insights Managerial Competence Proactive Stories

Beyond the Big Mo: How Leaders Keep the Ball Rolling

All too often the challenge for leaders is not the initiation of a new program, but rather that once initiated, that the program isn’t killed by inertia, bureaucratic minutia and indifference. The challenge for leaders, after initiating new programs, is to keep their eye on the ball, and keep the ball rolling. They must sustain momentum. Indeed, they must manage for momentum. They cannot simply drop the ball (i.e., launch new program or policy) and hope it keeps rolling. They must make sure it keeps rolling.

Often momentum is regarded as a monolithic and mystical “big mo.” How many times have I sat in Yankee stadium, watching the home team lose games, but by August, the wind is at their back and they seem to have caught the “big mo”? From the stands, it seems that suddenly all the stars aligned and they’re back in the groove. But is it as mystical as all that? Is momentum all that monolithic? All that mystical? Or is the fact, that away from the limelight, in practice and in the locker room, Joe Torre is capable of leading and managing for momentum? Managerially competent leaders understand that in order to control the big mo, they need to manage the four dimensions of momentum so their initiative stays on track, stays on people’s radar, and remains something that the organization continues to support.

The first dimension of momentum is structural momentum. Leaders who emphasize structural momentum are likely to say that things are likely to keep moving when the primary concern is who does what and making sure people have resources to keep going. Embedded here is a logistical notion of momentum. If you want to sustain momentum—worry about resources and responsibility. The second dimension of momentum is performance momentum, where leaders place emphasis on achievement and evaluation. If you want to sustain things in an organization and keep things moving, you need to make sure that evaluations are conducted, progress is measured, and feedback is given. The third dimension of momentum is cultural momentum. Leaders who sustain momentum place an emphasis on the group culture, where the cohesiveness of the culture and social psychological mechanisms, like peer pressure, will sustain projects to completion. The fourth dimension of momentum is political momentum, where leaders make sure that conflict is dealt with and that opposition is either challenged or incorporated.

When you view momentum in this way, you can develop a sense that there is something you can do to sustain it. That it isn’t simply this high concept that football games are made of. How you manage for momentum will depend on how you allocate resources, how you make corrections, how you maintain commitment, and how you deal with criticism. Proactive leaders do not view momentum as an unquantified state over which they have no control. Proactive leaders see momentum as a multi-dimensional commodity that can and must be managed in order to ensure the success of their initiative.

It is one thing to launch a program or policy, and another to keep it going. Keeping your eye on the ball means sustaining structural, performance, cultural, and political momentum. Great leaders don’t just initiate. They make sure they ball keeps rolling.

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights Managerial Competence

A Leader Should Keep Check on the Best and Brightest

Author: Samuel B. Bacharach

There has been much said about the leadership team that is emerging in Washington.  Who leaders rely on will often determine the tactics and the policies that will emerge.  A competent leader, therefore, tends to surround himself or herself with the “best and brightest”.  When a new leader takes over an organization, there is always the hope that they will bring the most knowledgeable, competent, and informed individuals, and these appointments will bring quality results and the best policies.  There is a notion that if you throw enough brains at a problem, you will come up with the best solution.  Those who lead complex, multi-faceted organizations never have all the information they need or all the experience they desire.  This lack of information and experience makes it essential that leaders make the best appointments.  However, the “best and brightest” who act with the full knowledge and arrogance that they are the best and the the brightest can make mistakes, do stupid things, and bring about disaster.

The best and brightest need humility to assure perspective, and a leader who will look over their shoulder to assure results.  Without humility in leadership, without someone truly in charge and without accountability, the best and brightest become cats that no one can herd.  Proactive leaders put in place multi-tier systems of checks and balances to assure that multiple opinions emerge, no one person dominates, and that groupthink is kept in check.