Categories
BLG Leadership Insights Leadership Videos

Alfred Hitchcock’s Leadership Style [Video]

Alfred Hitchcock, director of over 60 films, said, “When an actor comes to me and wants to discuss his character, I say, ‘It’s in the script.’ If he says, ‘But what’s my motivation?, I say, ‘Your salary.’”

His no-nonsense leadership style, while not endearing to actors, propelled Hitchcock from his position as an assistant director in an English studio to one of the biggest names in Hollywood in fewer than five years.

Hitchcock was born in England, the son of a greengrocer, and got his start in the film business by drawing sets and title cards. He quickly and passionately absorbed the processes involved in making films and started to write scripts for practice.

His dedication paid off and he was eventually allowed to direct his own full-length movies in England. His success brought him to Hollywood where he searched for bigger and better opportunities.

The rest is history. Hitchcock became a household name, synonymous with murder, intrigue, and espionage.

On the set Hitchcock was a notoriously low-key, hands-off leader who expected his crew and actors to do the job they were responsible for. According to one anecdote Doris Day eventually approached Hitchcock on the set of the The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) and wondered if she was doing a good job. He said he didn’t think she was doing a bad job and that was the end of it. He wasn’t prone to emotional flare-ups or tense dramatic moments. He simply wanted to get the job done.

In a more dramatic incident, Hitchcock called actors “cattle,” but later recanted his original statement and said, “My actor friends know I would never be capable of such a thoughtless, rude and unfeeling remark, that I would never call them cattle . . . What I probably said was that actors should be treated like cattle.”

Hitchcock believed in an authoritarian system that required his actors and crew to be autonomous while being responsive to commands.

Before Hitchcock set about making any film he would have most components planned before he began shooting. He was detail orientated, had no room for improvisations, and didn’t have kind feelings for ideas outside the boundaries he set. Each film was mapped out and rarely subjected to tinkering after it had been finalized.

Hitchcock blended a highly organized authoritative leadership structure with his laid-back, everyone-can-do-their-jobs attitude. His peculiar mix of leadership styles worked and it created tight story lines, fostered consistent productivity, and earned numerous industry accolades while letting the people he worked with flourish naturally.

Hitchcock was a champion of common sense (he once said, “The length of a film should be directly related to the endurance of the human bladder”) and a creative powerhouse. His ability to get things done while still being able to express himself consistently was a true skill and one that informs his dichotomous leadership style. A leadership method that combined practicality with a sharp focus on individual imagination and ingenuity.

Picture Credit: Moneysox

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

10 Signs You Are a Facilitative Leader

classroom-managementLast week we outlined directive leadership; what it means, what forms it takes, and when it is used. We were careful to point out that directive leadership, although task driven, isn’t the only or the best way to sustain momentum within an organization. Sometimes it can force an organization to produce unexpected results and, on other occasions, it can smother employee motivation and drive.

Leaders who are opposed to directive leadership’s main tenants and rely on reflection and adaptable priorities can be considered facilitative leaders. Facilitative leadership is used to sustain momentum by meeting challenges without a set action plan. Facilitative leaders value creativity, reflection, and brain storming over planning, commands, and efficiency. Again, facilitative leadership isn’t the right fit for some people and some organizations. While it might produce results for one set of people it might create apathy and inefficient work habits within another.

Here are 10 signs you are a facilitative leader:

1.You have the capacity to make adjustments: As a facilitative leader you aren’t afraid to change plans, ideas, and strategies.

2. You put emphasis on people’s ability to reflect and innovate: You trust your peers and employees to be able to create new solutions and ideas in creative ways.

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

Directive Leadership & Craigslists: The Innovation of Nothing

craig_newmarkLeadership is a non-dramatic act. You don’t need props and you don’t need a dramaturgical board room to get things done.

Just look at Craigslist.com founded by Craig Newmark. The bare-bones classified site, run by roughly 30 employees, attracts more traffic then Amazon.com and Ebay.com. What makes jaws drop is Craig Newmark’s leadership style that embraces molasses-like growth over expansion.

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

10 Tips on How to Sustain Momentum

spinningThe biggest challenge for a successful leader is sustaining momentum. Becoming a leader and achieving agendas is just the beginning. Great leaders are able to maintain the energy that propelled them to their success. Here are 10 key steps to sustaining momentum that I outlined in Keep Them on Your Side:

1. Distribute Resources: Give people the capacity to keep things moving

2. Make Needed Corrections: Monitor performance and make corrections along the way.

3. Develop Focus: Keep everyone’s eye on the prize. In other words, maintain focus.

4. Look for Problems: Anticipate opposition. Don’t wait for mistakes to happen…

Categories
BLG Leadership Insights

What’s Better: A Facilitative or Directive Leadership Style? Yahoo! Says Both

Yesterday the Wall Street Journal interviewed Yahoo’s new CEO, Carol Bartz. When asked about the structure of Yahoo and it’s history she states:

…Organizations can get in the way of innovation, because if people are all bound up, and if they don’t know if they get to make the decision or somebody else, and if they do, what happens to them, and so on and so forth. There’s a freeing when you organize around the idea that you’re clearly in charge and go for it. It’s really a fantastic group of people, and just cleaner lines and cleaner responsibility, and freedom to make mistakes, and have some fun. This whole business that there’s no innovation side of Yahoo is just the craziest thing I’ve ever heard.

Before the dot com bubble burst in the late 1990s many start-ups were run in an extremely facilitative manner, with an emphasis on teams rather than a hierarchy and an overflow of resources for R&D. When the bubble burst facilitative managerial structure was thrown out the window in favor of hierarchical control, fiduciary responsibility and mundane job descriptions. In other words, these new companies adopted a directive-based approach when re-tooling their organizational structure.

Facilitative organizations invest in exciting projects and innovation in hopes that creativity will beat out the competition. However, there is no guarantee return on investment–the innovation may never come, the exciting project may be out-dated. On the other hand directive leadership, perpetually focused on short and long term cost reduction, will suppress innovation and creativity in the long run. However, that said a directive leadership style does at least go a long way in guaranteeing accountability, coordination, and control. So the trick is knowing how to balance the two. It’s easy to be facilitative when, as we said the other day, you can accommodate experimentation and failure. It’s easy to be facilitative when you are playing a non-zero-sum game. It’s tempting to be directive when resources are scare, when time is pressured, and when your playing a zero-sum-game. The trick is how to be both facilitative and directive.

Carol Bartz, taking the helm of Yahoo in January of this year, did what any good CEO should do: she implemented both a facilitative and directive organizational leadership so Yahoo could continue to innovate without taking dangerous leaps of faith. She is both establishing a clear chain of command and asking her employees to innovate and make mistakes.